Employment Insurance | L'assurance-emploi |
===> Jump directly to the (modest) International section of this page <===
|
![]()
The Employment Insurance Program in
Canada: How it Works
By André Léonard
18 October 2010
HTML version
http://parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-52-e.htm
PDF version (254 Kb, 23 pages)
http://parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-52-e.pdf
|
2.3 Special Benefits 2.3.1 Maternity Benefits 2.3.2 Parental Benefits 2.3.3 Sickness Benefits 2.3.4 Compassionate Care Benefits 2.3.5 Statistics on Special Benefits 2.4 Fishing Benefits 2.5 Work-sharing 2.6 More Details on Unemployment Benefits 2.6.1 Combined Benefits 2.6.2 Provisions for Teachers 2.6.3 Pilot Projects 2.6.4 Appealing Employment Insurance Decisions 2.7 Employment Benefits 3 Employment Insurance Program Financing 3.1 Premiums 3.2 Setting the Premium Rate |
Source:
Parliamentary Information and Research Service:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Library/VirtualLibrary/ResearchPublications-E.asp
[ Library of Parliament Research Publications:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/About/Library/VirtualLibrary/ResearchPublicationsCurrent-e.asp
]
|
|
January 19, 2012
Employment Insurance, November 2011
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/120119/dq120119b-eng.htm
In November, the number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance
benefits totalled 539,000, virtually unchanged from the previous month.
- includes three tables:
* Employment Insurance: Statistics by province and territory
* Beneficiaries receiving regular benefits by age group, sex, province and
territory
* Beneficiaries receiving regular benefits by census metropolitan areas
Related link:
Employment Insurance Statistics Maps, November 2011
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/73-002-x/73-002-x2011010-eng.htm
- change in number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance
benefits in the last 12 months, by Census Metropolitan Areas and Census
Agglomerations.
- incl. Intro to maps + link to November 2011 maps [in the left margin]
Source:
Employment Insurance Statistics Maps - Product main page*
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=73-002-X&lang=eng
Set of maps presenting Employment Insurance Statistics. The maps show the
percentage change in the number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance
benefits in the last 12 months, by Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) and
Census Agglomerations (CAs), using 2001 Census geography. Data are also
shown in a tabular format.
---
* On the product main page, click "View" to see the latest issue
of this report online; click "Chronological index" for earlier
issues.
Tables by subject: Employment insurance, social assistance
and other transfers
http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/ind01/l3_2621_2627-eng.htm?hili_none
Related subjects:
* Labour
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/subject-sujet/theme-theme.action?pid=2621&lang=eng&more=0
* Employment insurance, social assistance and other
transfers
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/subject-sujet/subtheme-soustheme.action?pid=2621&id=2627&lang=eng&more=0
* Non-wage benefits
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/subject-sujet/subtheme-soustheme.action?pid=2621&id=2628&lang=eng&more=0
[ earlier editions of this report:
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=73-002-X&chropg=1&lang=eng
|
|
Andrew Jackson blogs on the Mowat Employment
Insurance report:
http://www.progressive-economics.ca/2011/11/16/the-mowat-centre-and-employment-insurance/
The Mowat report:
Making
it Work : Final Recommendations of the
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance Task Force
(PDF - 859K, 122 pages)
November 16, 2011
Source:
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance
Task Force
The Mowat Centre EI Task Force is examining Canada's support system for
the unemployed and will propose a blueprint for a strengthened national
system.
The EI Task Force is part of:
The Mowat Centre
The Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation is an independent, non-partisan public
policy research centre located at the School of Public Policy and Governance
at the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre undertakes collaborative
applied policy research and engages in public dialogue on Canadas
most important national issues, and proposes innovative, research-driven
public policy recommendations, informed by Ontarios reality.
|
|
Closing the gap between EI and welfare
http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1109317
By Laurie Monsebraaten
January 1, 2012
(...) [there is] a growing number of area workers who either arent
covered by EI or dont qualify and could benefit from a proposed Jobseekers
Loan designed to bridge the gap between employment insurance and welfare,
says social policy researcher Michael Mendelson. (...) Under Mendelsons
proposal, income-tested forgivable loans would be available in bi-weekly
payments of almost $700 for six months. The loans would be repaid based
on total earnings for the year the money was received they would
be completely forgivable for those with incomes below about $10,000 and
fully repayable for those earning about $71,000. At about $51,000, recipients
would have to repay half of the Jobseekers Loan. All adults looking
for work would be eligible for the full loan of almost $9,000 every five
years and it would could cost the federal government about $1 billion annually.
Source:
Toronto Star
http://www.thestar.com/
|
|
From the
Caledon Institute of Social Policy:
Fixing the Hole in Employment Insurance:
Temporary Income Assistance for the Unemployed (PDF - 132K, 37
pages)
http://www.caledoninst.org/pdf_en/967ENG.pdf
Michael Mendelson and Ken Battle
December 2011
Many unemployed Canadians are ineligible for Employment Insurance, so that
welfare becomes their only alternative. But welfare rates are low, especially
for single employable recipients. Further, applicants must exhaust their
financial assets, and the paternalistic requirements of welfare are stigmatizing.
As a consequence, it is difficult to bounce back from welfare into the economic
mainstream. The solution most often proposed has been to loosen the rules
for Employment Insurance; however, we show in this paper that many unemployed
workers would still be left in the cold even if we did that. Something is
needed between Employment Insurance, with its relatively higher benefits
but limited reach, and welfare, to which anyone in need can apply but only
for inadequate benefits. We propose a new temporary income measure to fill
the gap between Employment Insurance and welfare the Jobseekers
Loan.
Source:
Caledon Institute of Social Policy
http://www.caledoninst.org/
---
NOTE : The Caledon Institute of Social Policy website was recently relaunched. If you have links to or bookmarks for some of Caledon's reports, you'll have to update those. The Publications section of the new site [ http://www.caledoninst.org/pub_search.php ] contains links to hundreds of reports, articles, submissions, etc., back to 1993. Take a few minutes to visit the new Caledon website!
|
|
Manitoba
Welfare fills gap as jobless wait for
EI
Federal government to blame for tardy processing, advocate says
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/welfare-fills-gap-as-jobless-wait-for-ei-136420573.html
By Bruce Owen
December 30, 2011
More Manitobans are collecting welfare despite the province having one of
the lowest unemployment rates in the country, the most recent provincial
numbers say.
And experts say one reason is due to the unemployed being forced to apply
for provincial social assistance because of increasing delays in processing
federal Employment Insurance claims. (...) Neil Cohen, executive director
of Winnipeg's Community Unemployed Help Centre, said it's becoming more
common for jobless Manitobans to collect provincial assistance because of
the length of time it takes to get Employment Insurance claims processed.
In some cases, it takes up to six weeks or longer.
Source:
Winnipeg Free Press
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/
Related links:
Community Unemployed Help Centre (CUHC)
http://www.cuhc.mb.ca/
CUHC is a non-profit organization primarily dedicated to providing information,
advice and representation to unemployed workers in Manitoba experiencing
Employment Insurance problems. We also engage in broader social policy issues
related to unemployment.
- incl. links to:
* Home * About Us * What You Need to Know Before You Apply * UI/EI Information
* Appeals Information * Making EI Better * Help Centres in Other Provinces
* Links
TIP : CUHC's roots are in the Manitoba
labour movement, but Employment Insurance is a federal program, so the information
on the CUHC website applies to all jurisdictions. Recommended reading!
|
|
From Statistics Canada:
December 16, 2011
Employment Insurance, October 2011
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/111216/tdq111216-eng.htm
The number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance benefits
declined slightly (-5,400 or -1.0%) to 541,200 in October, continuing a
year-long downward trend.
- includes three tables:
* Employment Insurance: Statistics by province and territory
* Beneficiaries receiving regular benefits by age group, sex, province and
territory
* Beneficiaries receiving regular benefits by census metropolitan areas
Related link:
Employment Insurance Statistics Maps, October 2011
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/73-002-x/73-002-x2011010-eng.htm
- change in number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance
benefits in the last 12 months, by Census Metropolitan Areas and Census
Agglomerations.
- incl. Intro to maps + link to September 2011 maps [in the left margin]
Source:
Employment Insurance Statistics Maps - Product main page*
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=73-002-X&lang=eng
Set of maps presenting Employment Insurance Statistics. The maps show the
percentage change in the number of people receiving regular Employment Insurance
benefits in the last 12 months, by Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) and
Census Agglomerations (CAs), using 2001 Census geography. Data are also
shown in a tabular format.
---
* On the product main page, click "View" to see the latest issue
of this report online; click "Chronological index" for earlier
issues.
Tables by subject: Employment insurance, social assistance
and other transfers
http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/ind01/l3_2621_2627-eng.htm?hili_none
Related subjects:
* Labour
* Employment
insurance, social assistance and other transfers
* Non-wage
benefits
[ earlier editions of this report ]
|
|
|
Star
editorial on making EI standards national:
November 8, 2011
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1083599--set-national-standards-for-ei
Ontario lost 75,000 full-time jobs last month by far the biggest
loss among the provinces. As many of these laid-off workers now turn to
the employment insurance (EI) program for help, can they count on a program
adequate for Ontarios tough times? The evidence says no.
Source:
Toronto Star
|
|
Making
it Work : Final Recommendations of the
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance Task Force
(PDF - 859K, 122 pages)
November 16, 2011
In Spring 2010, the Mowat Centre convened the Employment Insurance Task
Force.
The Task Forces mandate was to review the current Employment Insurance
(EI) system, consult about its relevance to contemporary realities, and
make recommendations about improving Canadas support system for the
unemployed. At the outset, we committed that any recommendations would be
evidence-based and principled. We also committed that this process would
be transparent, non-partisan, and incorporate a diversity of perspectives.
To this end, we held extensive consultations
with employers, workers, and civil society. We commissioned research from
Canadas top experts. We hosted a series of technical consultations
to vet our proposals. (...) Based on our research and consultation, we propose
a blueprint for a strengthened national program to support the unemployed.
(...)
Our 18 recommendations are organized around four themes:
- a nationally standardized system,
- active employment measures (i.e. training),
- special benefits, and
- financing and management.
We recommend transformational changes, as well as smaller changes that address
long-standing irritants in the EI system.
Source:
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance
Task Force
The Mowat Centre EI Task Force is examining Canada's support system for
the unemployed and will propose a blueprint for a strengthened national
system.
The EI Task Force is part of:
The Mowat Centre
The Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation is an independent, non-partisan public
policy research centre located at the School of Public Policy and Governance
at the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre undertakes collaborative
applied policy research and engages in public dialogue on Canadas
most important national issues, and proposes innovative, research-driven
public policy recommendations, informed by Ontarios reality.
|
|
November 11, 2011
New papers from the
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance Task Force:
NOTE : This series
of four papers was commissioned by the Mowat Centre Employment Insurance
Task Force to serve as sources of input for the Task Force
as it develops recommendations for reform of Canadas Employment Insurance
system. Watch for the release of the final recommendations
of the Mowat Centre EI Task Force on November 16th.
The
Income Sources for Long-Term Workers
Who Exhaust Employment Insurance Benefits (PDF - 917K, 33 pages)
By Ross Finney et al.
This research has two main goals. The first is to track those individuals
who exhausted a spell of regular Employment Insurance (EI) benefits during
the 1990s and early into the new millennium in order to investigate the
labour market outcomes in their post-EI periods. We focus particularly on
individuals who experienced an extended work period prior to receiving EI
benefits. The second objective is to examine whether there have been shifts
in these patterns following the numerous reforms to EI and Social Assistance
(SA) that took place in the 1990s.
Fixing
the Hole in Employment Insurance:
Temporary Income Assistance for the Unemployed
(PDF - 859K, 35 pages)
By Michael Mendelson and Ken Battle
(...) At present, welfare is the only resort for the unemployed in financial
need who are not eligible for Employment Insurance. But welfare is a highly
stigmatizing and invasive program. We have therefore proposed the development
of an income-tested program between welfare and Employment Insurance
which would provide limited and temporary financial assistance to those
in need who are actively engaged in job search.
Trading
Places : Single Adults Replace Lone Parents
as the New Face of Social Assistance in Canada (PDF - 1.4MB,
32 pages)
By John Stapleton and Vass Bednar
This paper suggests that social and economic policies should be implemented
and existing programs should be reworked in order to address the needs of
single adults as the newly vulnerable in Canada. The paper also calls on
government to improve access to unemployment and social assistance data
for future research.
Hidden
Regional Differentiation:
EI and Unequal Federal Support for Low Income Workers (PDF -
850K, 27 pages)
By Jon Medow
Analysis of regional differentiation in EI weekly benefit calculation and
the uneven federal approach to support of low income workers.
Source:
Mowat Centre Employment Insurance
Task Force
The Mowat Centre EI Task Force is examining Canada's support system for
the unemployed and will propose a blueprint for a strengthened national
system.
The EI Task Force is part of:
The Mowat Centre
The Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation is an independent, non-partisan public
policy research centre located at the School of Public Policy and Governance
at the University of Toronto. The Mowat Centre undertakes collaborative
applied policy research and engages in public dialogue on Canadas
most important national issues, and proposes innovative, research-driven
public policy recommendations, informed by Ontarios reality.
More selected site
content from
the Mowat Centre EI Task Force - this link takes you lower down
on the page you're now reading.
|
|
Government
launches Employment Insurance rate-setting consultations
News Release
August 18, 2011
(...) The consultations will focus on how the EI rate-setting mechanism
can be further improved to ensure more stable and predictable rates, while:
* Ensuring the EI program breaks even over time;
* Avoiding large cumulative surpluses or deficits; and
* Maintaining a transparent rate-setting process.
(...) As previously announced, a web-based consultation process will invite
written recommendations.
Individuals interested in participating
in the consultations
online are invited to do so through the main consultation link:
http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/consult/eiprs-etcac-eng.asp
Closing date of this
consultation is November 30, 2011.
These consultations are open to anybody interested in participating.
Submissions can be emailed to ei-consultations-ae@fin.gc.ca
Related Document:
Employment
Insurance Premium Rate Setting
NOTE: this link takes you to a section of the main consultation link above.
|
|
From Statistics Canada:
June 27, 2011
Employment
Insurance Coverage Survey, 2010
In 2010, rates of eligibility for receiving regular Employment Insurance
(EI) benefits declined compared with 2009, when Canada was in an economic
downturn. The eligibility rate fell for both men and young people aged 15
to 24, but remained unchanged for women.
- includes links to three tables:
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits,
2010
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits
by sex, 2010
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits,
by province, 2010
More
information about the
Employment Insurance Coverage Survey (EICS)
The Employment Insurance Coverage Survey provides a meaningful picture of
who does or does not have access to EI benefits among the jobless and those
in a situation of underemployment. The survey also covers access to maternity
and parental benefits.
- includes detailed information for 2010, the questionnaire(s) and reporting
guide(s), a description of the survey, data sources and methodology and
data accuracy.
Related subjects:
* Labour
* Employment
insurance, social assistance and other transfers
* Non-wage
benefits
Source:
The Daily
[Statistics Canada]
|
|
|
|
|
How
to Make $57 Billion Disappear:
The
Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board
October 13, 2010
In this blog posting, former senior Finance Canada officials Clark and DeVries
note that the Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board (CEIFB) was created
as a Crown Corporation in the 2008 federal Budget. The stated objectives
of the CEIFB were to (1) enhance the independence of the premium rate setting
and (2) to ensure that employment insurance (EI) premiums are used exclusively
for the EI program. However, Clark and DeVries explain in detail in this
article that "the creation of this Crown corporation does neither."
So why was the CEIFB created, you ask?
"The only reason was to get rid of the cumulative surplus in the EI Account, which as of March 31, 2009 stood at $57.2 billion. Although notional in nature, this balance has been an ongoing embarrassment to the government. The creation of the CEIFB effectively wipes out this massive cumulative balance and replaces it with a cash reserve of $2 billion, under the pretense of creating a more independent process. In her Opinion on the 2009-10 condensed financial statements, the Auditor General noted that she would be commenting in more detail on significant accounting changes to the accounts for the Employment Insurance program, which she wanted to draw to Parliaments attention. There was no debate on this when the legislation that created the CEIFB was approved by Parliament. It is doubtful that the current members of the CEIFB were even aware of this when they were appointed."
Source:
3D policy
[ About the authors
]
NOTE: click the 3D policy link above to read over a dozen other blog entries
since September 2010 by two former senior Finance Canada insiders in the
federal budget process.
|
|
Another
EI Absurdity
By Andrew Jackson
November 12, 2010
Well under one half of Canadas 1.5 million unemployed workers are
collecting EI benefits today, even though the national unemployment rate
is still almost 8%. Special EI measures introduced as part of the 2009 Budget,
notably an extra 5 weeks of benefits for all claimants, expired this fall,
long before a real labour market recovery has taken place. (...) The situation
is especially grim in Ontario. Less than one in three (32.0%) of unemployed
Ontario workers received regular EI benefits in August. This is well below
the national average of 44.4%, even though the Ontario unemployment rate
is well above the national rate (8.6% compared to 7.9% in October).
Source:
Progressive Economics
Forum Blog
|
|
This page is a collection of links to reports and media
articles about Employment Insurance (EI).
The first links below the red bar are to the "official" EI program
sub-site on the HRSDC website and the latest EI Monitoring Assessment Report,
and the rest of this page comprises links to a selection of related articles
and reports from various sources...
|
The "official" Employment Insurance website: |
|
Selected
reports and media articles on the |
From Jennefer Laidley
of the Income Security Advocacy Centre:
September 29, 30 (2010)
Flaherty discussing and reviewing EI premium increase and hinting that deficit may be bigger than thought:
CBC:
No decision on EI premiums: Flaherty
Finance minister also says deficit may be worse than thought
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/09/30/ei-premiums-deficit.html
Globe:
Ottawa to scale back EI premium increase set for January
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-to-scale-back-ei-premium-increase-set-for-january/article1734052/
Sun:
Government hints EI rate increase likely
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2010/09/29/15521396.html
Post:
John Ivison: Tories do the right thing on EI
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/29/john-ivison-tories-do-the-right-thing-on-ei/
Sun:
Pogey panic button
Flaherty needs to step in and stop big EI rate hike
http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/david_akin/2010/09/29/15524811.html
Seems like Ignatieff is also having second thoughts
about EI changes but hes flip-flopping on improving EI:
Globe:
Ignatieff changes his mind on EI bill
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ignatieff-changes-his-mind-on-ei-bill/article1732585/
Thanks to Jennefer Laidley of the Income Security Advocacy
Centre (ISAC) in Toronto
for sharing the above links. Visit BOTH of ISAC's websites!
ISAC website:
www.incomesecurity.org
Social Assistance Review website:
www.sareview.ca
|
|
EI
Financing: Reset Required (PDF - 39K,
4 pages)
September 2010
By Michael Mendelson, Ken Battle and Sherri Torjman
In mid-November 2010, the Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board will
likely recommend a 15-cent increase in Employment Insurance employee premiums
from $1.73 to $1.88 per $100 of insurable earnings for 2011. The contribution
for employers is 1.4 times the employee premium so the cost for employers
will rise as well. The Cabinet has until November 30 to act on the Board?s
recommendation. The Cabinet could decide to reject the proposal and continue
the current EI premium freeze for another year. Either way, it faces a tough
dilemma.
Source:
Caledon Institute of Social Policy
Established in 1992, the Caledon Institute of Social Policy is a private,
nonprofit organization with charitable status. It is supported primarily
by the Maytree Foundation, located in Toronto. Caledon is an independent
and critical voice that does not depend on government funding and is not
affiliated with any political party.
|
|
Government
panel pushes for maximum increase in EI premiums
Ottawa to decide whether to overrule board it created as critics argue increase
will slash jobs during fragile economic recovery
September 9, 2010
By Bill Curry
A new panel created by the Harper government will move to raise employment
insurance premiums by the maximum allowed, despite calls to leave payroll
taxes frozen in light of Canadas fragile jobs picture. Canadians will
start feeling the hit on their paycheques when the two-year freeze on EI
premiums announced in the 2009 budget comes to an end on Jan. 1. Employers
will also have to cough up more in premiums for their workers, which economists
and business groups warn could hurt employment.The Globe and Mail has learned
that an internal report on EI rates by a new independent body will recommend
they be raised by 15 cents on every $100 earned, an 8.7-per-cent increase
from the current $1.73 and the maximum allowed under federal law. Employers
will have to pay an extra 21 cents per $100.
Source:
Globe and Mail
Related link:
EI
Premiums Come Full Circle
By Andrew Jackson
September 9, 2010
For reasons that escape me, the Globe ran a headline front page story today
[see above] on what all fiscal policy and Employment Insurance wonks have
known to be true for some time. Under current legislation, and as announced
in the 2009 Budget, the EI premium rate set by a supposedly autonomous but
tightly constrained new body will rise by 15 cents per $100 of insured earnings
for workers, and by 21 cents per $100 of earnings for employers in January.
This is the maximum increase allowed, and the maximum increase is required
since premiums must rise to balance revenues and expenditures if the fund
has no surplus. Premiums must rise, that is, unless the government decides
to exercise its right to unilaterally set the premium rate, which it does
not intend to do. This is a new chapter in an old story which brings us
full circle. Once again, the federal government will be deliberately running
annual EI account surpluses to reduce the public debt. Minister Flaherty
is taking a rather big play out of Paul Martins book.
Source:
Progressive Economics
Forum Blog
|
|
Ottawa
ends enhanced EI program
September 9, 2010
By Tanya Talaga
Ontario workers who lose their jobs next week will receive less employment
insurance. As of Saturday (September 11), Ottawa will cancel an extra five
weeks of regular EI benefits and end a program that provided up to an additional
20 weeks of benefits for longer-serving employees. (...) Last year, Prime
Minister Stephen Harper enhanced regular EI benefits for laid off workers
by five weeks in response to the crippling of Canadas job market during
the economic downturn. Ottawa also enhanced benefits for longer-serving
employees by up to 20 weeks. Five weeks of benefits roughly equals $1,768
on average EI claims are based on 55 per cent of a persons
income. Twenty weeks is a lost $7,072.
Source:
Toronto Star
Related links:
Government of Canada news release announcing
the extended EI benefits in September 2009:
Government
of Canada intends to table legislation to
extend Employment Insurance benefits for long-tenured workers
September 14, 2009
...the Government of Canada has given notice that it intends to introduce
legislation that would temporarily provide additional Employment Insurance
(EI) regular benefits to unemployed long-tenured workers. These are individuals
who have worked and paid EI premiums for a significant period of time and
have previously made limited use of EI regular benefits.
Source:
Canada News Centre
----------
From Human
Resources and Skills Development Canada (HRSDC),
the federal department responsible for EI:
Extended
Employment Insurance
regular benefits for long tenured workers
Fact Sheet
Web page dated 2009-11-25
Source:
Employment
Insurance (HRSDC)
|
|
Help
Wanted: How Well did the EI Program Respond During Recent Recessions?
September 8, 2010
This Mowat Note assesses how well Canadas Employment Insurance system
performed during the most recent recession compared to previous recessions,
focusing on regional inequities. (...) The analysis reveals that regional
differences in coverage between provinces were significant. In Ontario and
British Columbia in 2009, only 38 per cent and 39 per cent (respectively)
of the unemployed were receiving benefits, while in some other provinces,
over 90 per cent of the unemployed were receiving benefits.
Full
text (PDF - 335K, 16 pages)
By Matthew Mendelsohn & Jon Medow
September 2010
Source:
Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation
(University of Toronto)
The Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation has been set up to help inform and
revitalize Canadas public policy agenda, given new Canadian and global
realities. This includes questioning many of the assumptions that underlie
our current approaches, while ensuring that all of us continue to share
a sense of common citizenship, benefit from equality of opportunity, and
have access to all the benefits of being Canadian
Related link:
A
disguised welfare scheme
By Lorne Gunter
September 10, 2010
(...) Released Wednesday by the University of Toronto's Mowat Centre for
Policy Innovation, the study [on Employment Insurance disparity] shows that
during the 2008-09 recession, Ontario and Western workers received half
the benefits per capita that unemployed workers in Atlantic Canada and Quebec
received.
According to researchers, only 38% of unemployed workers in Ontario and 39% in B.C. received benefits, despite those provinces being among the hardest hit with job losses. And while 42% of Canada's unemployed lived in Ontario, laid-off workers in that province received only 25% of training funds available through EI.
Source:
National Post
From The Daily
[Statistics Canada]:
Employment
Insurance Coverage Survey, 2009
June 10, 2010
Among the 1.04 million unemployed individuals who contributed to the Employment
Insurance (EI) program in 2009, 857,000 had a recent job separation that
met the EI program criteria. Of those, 739,000 or 86.2% were eligible to
receive regular EI benefits because they worked enough hours, up from 82.2%
in 2008.
- includes links to three tables:
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits,
2009
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits
by sex, 2009
* Coverage and eligibility of the unemployed for Employment Insurance benefits,
by province, 2009
|
|
EI
Monitoring and Assessment Report 2009
Posted to the HRSDC website in April 2010
The 2009 Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report focuses on
the period April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009. The Honourable Diane Finley,
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, tabled the report in
Parliament on April 29, 2010. The report, prepared by the Canada Employment
Insurance Commission, monitors and assesses the impacts of the Employment
Insurance program on the economy, communities and individuals.
Table of contents:
* Chapter 1 of this report provides an overview of the Canadian labour
market in 2007/08.
* Chapter 2 is an overview of EI benefits (income benefits) under
Part I of the Employment Insurance Act for the same period.
* Chapter 3 gives information about the support provided to unemployed
workers through active re-employment measures, known as Employment Benefits
and Support Measures
* Chapter 4 presents information on EI program administration and
service delivery.
* Chapter 5 analyzes the impacts and effectiveness of the EI program
based on administrative data, internal and external research, and evaluative
studies.
Highlights
* Lowest employment growth in 15 years, due to the global recession in 2008/09
* Access to benefits was high among those who contributed to the program.
* Regular EI claims increased in 2008/09, in the midst of the first recession
since 1991/92
* Total regular and special benefits paid increased for both men and women
* Maternity and parental claims increased
* Fishing claims continued to decrease
* There was a significant increase in the number of Work Sharing agreements
* Active employment measures helped Canadians prepare for, obtain and maintain
employment
Source:
Employment
Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Reports
NOTE: this page of the HRSDC website contains direct links to the reports
for 2009, 2008 and 2007 *only*, along with the following friendly
rejoinder:
"If you would like to request copies of the previous Monitoring and
Assessment Reports, please contact the Publications/Distribution Unit."
That's not accountability, that's obstruction. People should never have
to divulge their identity to access a public report.
Shame on you, HRSDC.
Related links:
* Canada Employment Insurance Commission
* Employment Insurance Regulations
* Canada Gazette: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Source:
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
HRSDC is responsible for the administration of EI in Canada.
|
|
Ontario
seeks Ottawa's help as welfare cases spike
Province calling for national standard for accessing
Employment Insurance payments as laid-off workers exhaust their federal
benefits
March 15, 2010
By Bill Curry
"(...) Ontario in particular is calling on Ottawa to step in with a
further expansion of federal EI so that provinces and workers are treated
the same no matter where they live in Canada. Because EI is easier to get
in regions of historically high unemployment, the province says many Ontarians
who lost their jobs during the recession were left out."
Source:
The Globe and Mail
|
|
What
happens when Employment Insurance runs out?
February 15, 2010
By Carol Goar
"[People who have] exhausted their employment insurance benefits (...)
were largely ignored in Ottawa's stimulus package. The 2009 federal budget
extended EI benefits for a mere five weeks. Last September, to alleviate
public pressure, the government added a 5-to-20-week top-up for older workers.
(...) EI exhaustees are by no means the worst-off victims of the recession.
But their plight provides an early glimpse of what Canadians can expect
from Ottawa, as they face as a long, debilitating job drought.
[ more
columns by Carol Goar ]
Source:
The Toronto Star
|
|
EI
system failing recession stress testreport
News Release
January 25, 2010
OTTAWACanadas Employment Insurance system is failing the stress
test of the recession and fixing it must be a key priority in the
upcoming federal budget, says a new report from the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives (CCPA). According to the report, even as the EI system
became easier to access the number of unemployed Canadians not in receipt
of EI benefits jumped from 650,760 in October 2008 to 777,4000 in October
2009.Many unemployed workers have fallen through the cracks of the
EI system, says Andrew Jackson, Chief Economist with the Canadian
Labour Congress and a CCPA Research Associate. In October 2009, 51%
of unemployed Canadians were collecting EI benefitsand just 41% in
Ontario.
Complete report:
Is
EI Working for Canadas Unemployed?
Analyzing The Great Recession (PDF - 348K, 8 pages)
January 2010
By Andrew Jackson
Source:
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
(CCPA)
The CCPA is an independent, non-partisan research institute concerned with
issues of social and economic justice. Founded in 1980, the CCPA is one
of Canadas leading progressive voices in public policy debates. By
combining solid research with extensive outreach, we work to enrich democratic
dialogue and ensure Canadians know there are workable solutions to the issues
we face.
|
|
Notice
of Intent Fairness for the Self Employed Act
December 2009
The Canada Employment Insurance Commission is contemplating amendments to
the Employment Insurance Regulations to reflect the amendments to the Employment
Insurance Act (EI Act) contained in Bill C-56, the Fairness for the Self-Employed
Act, which received Royal Assent on December 15, 2009. Bill C-56 provides
EI special benefits, which are maternity, parental, sickness and compassionate
care benefits, to self-employed persons on a voluntary basis. To the extent
possible, these benefits will mirror the special benefits currently available
to paid employees already covered under the existing Employment Insurance
Act. For more information or to provide comments on the proposed amendments,
please consult the Notice of Intent in the Canada Gazette.
Related links:
* Canada Employment Insurance Commission
* Employment Insurance Regulations
* Bill C-56, the Fairness for the Self-Employed Act (Fact sheet)
* Fairness for the Self-Employed Act passed by Parliament (December 16, 2009)
* Canada Gazette: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Source:
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
|
|
EI:
Evidence of Exhaustion?
Posted by Erin Weir
October 27, 2009
Analysis by Erin Weir
Todays Employment Insurance (EI) figures indicate that, in August,
23,000 more Canadians filed EI claims but 19,000 fewer received EI benefits.
The most optimistic possibility is that all of the workers who stopped receiving
benefits got jobs. Indeed, the Labour Force Survey indicates that total
employment rose by 27,000 in August.
Source:
Progressive Economics
Blog
|
|
Government
of Canada intends to table legislation
to extend Employment Insurance benefits
for long-tenured workers
September
14, 2009
The Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills
Development, and the Honourable Jean-Pierre Blackburn, Minister of National Revenue
and Minister of State (Agriculture), today announced that the Government of Canada
has given notice that it intends to introduce legislation that would temporarily
provide additional Employment Insurance (EI) regular benefits to unemployed long-tenured
workers. These are individuals who have worked and paid EI premiums for a significant
period of time and have previously made limited use of EI regular benefits. (...)
This new measure is designed to provide additional support to workers who have
paid EI premiums for years and made limited use of the program, while they look
for jobs in a recovering economy. It is a temporary measure, which builds on those
introduced in Canadas Economic Action
Plan. (...) Through the Economic Action Plan, the Government of Canada has
also implemented measures to support all unemployed Canadians. These measures
include providing nationally five extra weeks of EI regular benefits, increasing
the maximum duration of benefits from 45 to 50 weeks in regions of high unemployment,
protecting jobs through the Work-Sharing program, and freezing EI premiums for
2010 at the same rate as 2009 to provide economic stimulus.
Source:
Canadian
Government News Centre
Related links:
EI
Woes
By Armine Yalnizyan
September 18th, 2009
The latest changes
to EI to be introduced by the Conservatives do almost nothing for the shock troops
of the labour market, those who were first felled when the recession hit last
year. Bill C-50 will pass whether or not it is fast-tracked today or well-considered
in committee depends on how the procedural tactics imbedded in the bill are handled
by all of the opposition parties but it is a resounding bust for those
whose benefits are due to run out just about now.
Source:
Relentlessly
Progressive Economics Blog
[ Progressive
Economics Forum ]
Economic policy-making and economics
instruction in Canada have both increasingly come to reflect a conservative, free-market
perspective. There is an urgent need to promote an alternative, progressive economics
community in Canada.Over 125 progressive economistsworking in universities,
the labour movement, and activist research organizationshave joined forces
to make our collective, critical perspective heard. We have formed the Progressive
Economics Forum. [ About
PEF ]
Also from Armine at PEF:
Employment
Insurance Reforms - Unfinished Business of the Recession
By Armine
Yalnizyan
September 14, 2009
With their backs once again to the wall, the
Conservatives today announced that they will, at long last, propose additional
measures to help the unemployed, something almost everyone inside and outside
Parliament has been asking them to do for the better part of a year. They will
extend employment insurance benefits by another 5 to 20 weeks for those who qualify
to their new rules, a move they claim will help about 190,000 unemployed Canadians
people who are already protected by Employment Insurance provisions, but
are running out of time. But they will only qualify for the new help if they meet
all sorts of other conditions that make them the deserving unemployed
in the Conservatives eyes long-term tenure at their job, and not
having made a claim for help in the past.
A little reality check is in order...
Source:
Relentlessly
Progressive Economics Blog
[ Progressive
Economics Forum ]
Economic policy-making and economics instruction in Canada
have both increasingly come to reflect a conservative, free-market perspective.
There is an urgent need to promote an alternative, progressive economics community
in Canada.Over 125 progressive economistsworking in universities, the labour
movement, and activist research organizationshave joined forces to make
our collective, critical perspective heard. We have formed the Progressive Economics
Forum. [ About
PEF ]
|
|
Conservatives
buy some time
Election tension eases as NDP indicates it will likely back government over
EI improvements
September 15, 2009
OTTAWAPrime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives set the stage
for their first parliamentary survival test on Friday, but the threatened
political showdown that could lead to an early election appeared to be losing
steam.
Source:
Toronto Star
Supporting
Working Canadian Families:
The Role of Employment Insurance Special Benefits
(PDF - 105K, 33 pages)
By Michael J. Prince
September 2009
This paper
explores the Employment Insurance (EI) policy objective of encouraging long-term
labour market attachment by providing temporary income support during absences
from work due to life events such as illness, childbirth and caring for a terminally
ill family member. The study was undertaken as part of an ongoing assessment of
the policies and programs of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, which
is examining how EI may need to adjust to better align with current shifts in
the labour market and society. The report examines five EI special benefits: the
Family Supplement, Sickness, Parental, Maternity and Compassionate Care. The paper
also includes a chronology of major developments in family-related benefits in
EI policy from 1941 to 2006. Because EI special benefits operate at the intersection
of labour market policy, income security policy and family policy, these benefits
enable a better balance between work and family life, and have important implications
for each of these policy domains.
Source:
Caledon
Institute of Social Policy
The Caledon Institute of Social Policy does
rigorous, high-quality research and analysis; seeks to inform and influence public
opinion and to foster public discussion on poverty and social policy; and develops
and promotes concrete, practicable proposals for the reform of social programs
at all levels of government and of social benefits provided by employers and the
voluntary sector.
Tories
to introduce own EI reform
Human Resources Minister says changes
to come in fall session;
Liberals question why proposals weren't made to the bipartisan working group
By Rhéal Séguin (no relation)
Quebec City
September 7, 2009
Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives are planning to unveil an
unemployment insurance reform package in the coming session of Parliament,
in effect undermining one of the Liberal party's justifications for a fall
election. A bipartisan working group on EI failed to agree to changes to
the program over the summer, with the Liberals accusing the Tories of not
bringing any proposals to the table. Last week, when the Liberals announced
their intention of defeating the government and said they would no longer
attend the working group, Conservative committee member Diane Finley chastised
them for walking away from the discussions. (...) The [proposed Conservative]
move to introduce their own EI plan suggests the Harper Conservatives, gearing
up for an election campaign, want to shift the blame onto the opposition
for failing to help the growing ranks of Canada's unemployed. (...) Yesterday
Marlene Jennings, one of the two Liberal MPs on the committee, accused the
government of acting in bad faith by now tabling proposals that could easily
have been debated by the EI reform panel.
Source:
Globe and Mail
|
|
EI:
The Decline Resumes
May 20, 2010
Commentary on EI stats by Erin Weir
Statistics Canada reports that, after Februarys pause, Employment
Insurance (EI) resumed its contraction in March. Specifically, 24,200 fewer
Canadians received regular EI benefits. The key question is whether these
unemployed workers found jobs or simply ran out of benefits.
Also by Erin Weir:
Stingy
EI Benefits
By Erin Weir
April 22, 2010
This morning, Statistics Canada released Employment Insurance (EI) figures
for February. These figures show slightly more recipients nationally, but
somewhat fewer recipients among provinces. (...) The status quo is that
more than 1.5 million Canadians are officially unemployed, but that fewer
than 700,000 receive EI benefits. Continuing that state of affairs is a
poor outcome.
Employment
Insurance Runs Out
February 19, 2010
The number of Canadians receiving Employment Insurance (EI) benefits plummeted
in December. The drop of 40,100 was the largest monthly decrease in years.
One would anticipate some decline in the number of EI recipients as the
job market begins to recover. But the magnitude of Decembers decline
suggests that, in addition to those former recipients who found work, many
more simply ran out of benefits. The Labour Force Survey indicates that
employment decreased by 2,600 in December. Therefore, it seems unlikely
that 40,100 EI recipients found jobs during that month. (...) Fewer than
half (47.8 %) of unemployed Canadians received EI benefits in December.
Source:
Blog : Relentlessly
Progressive Economics
[ Progressive Economics
Forum ]
The Progressive Economics Forum aims to promote the development of a progressive
economics community in Canada. The PEF brings together over 125 progressive
economists, working in universities, the labour movement, and activist research
organizations.
[ more postings on Employment Insurance from the Progressive Economics Forum website ]
|
From The Globe and Mail:
Employment
Insurance data don't count those who run out
Without statistics on the
number of jobless Canadians whose employment insurance
benefits have been
exhausted, it's difficult to gauge how many are headed for welfare.
By
Tavia Grant
October 26, 2009
In a country that dutifully tallies
everything from egg sales to steel wire production, one crucial piece of the economic
puzzle is missing. When Statistics Canada releases its monthly report on employment
insurance today, notable will be the lack of information on the number of unemployed
who have exhausted their EI benefits. This is frustrating the efforts of economists
and also complicating public policy, because how can governments and support agencies
respond if the full extent of the problem is unknown? We don't know whether
people are departing for new employment, or if they are exhausting benefits and
persisting in the unemployment pool and that is problematic, said
Grant Bishop, an economist at Toronto-Dominion Bank. There could definitely
be better disclosure on the character of EI. Mr. Bishop noted that this
poor real-time gauge of how many unemployed are without income has
implications for how governments plan the rates and delivery of social assistance.
Currently no federal body publishes timely statistics showing how often EI benefits
run out or welfare rates across the country, which economists expect to rise.
Related Globe articles:
* Bringing
EI to self-employed tricky task
* Workers,
employers face EI premium hikes: report
Employment
Insurance: A Tale of Two Provinces
Posted by Erin Weir
August 25, 2009
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times
It would be welcome news if the number of Canadians receiving Employment
Insurance (EI) benefits increased because of a proactive policy decision
to expand this program to combat the recession. In fact, the ongoing rise
in EI beneficiaries simply reflects the deterioration of Canadas labour
market. We are still in the worst of times. Every month, tens
of thousands more Canadians are laid off than can find new jobs.
TIP : Click the link above and scroll
down the next page to see a table showing Employment Insurance coverage
across Canada in June 2009 (seasonally-adjusted figures). For each province
and for Canada, the table shows the number of EI recipients, the number
of people who are unemployed and the resulting percentage of EI coverage.
Where would you prefer to live - Ontario, where 41.3% of unemployed people
qualify for EI, or Newfoundland and Labrador, where EI covered 112.4% of
unemployed workers in June 2009? [No, this is not a typo.]
Source:
Progressive Economics
Forum Blog
[ other
posts by Erin Weir ]
[ Progressive Economics Forum
]
|
|
Canada's
Shrinking Safety Net:
Employment Insurance in the Great Recession (PDF - 41K, 5 pages)
Michael Mendelson, Ken Battle and Sherri Torjman
April 2009
Belt-tightening changes made to Employment Insurance in the 1990s have decimated
the programs coverage over the years and substantially reduced the
value of payments. Today only three in ten unemployed Canadians receive
regular EI benefits in contrast to eight in ten in the last recession, in
1990.
Source:
Caledon Institute of Social Policy
Related link:
EI
Monitoring and Assessment Report 2008
Source:
Human Resources and Skills
Development Canada(HRSDC)
NOTE: numbers will differ between StatCan's 2008 EI coverage report and
the EI assessment report "...because StatCan uses seasonally unadjusted
data on unemployment and EI beneficiaries, while HRSDC uses seasonally adjusted
unemployment data. StatCan uses seasonally unadjusted data on EI beneficiaries
because they prefer to use comparable seasonally unadjusted data for unemployment."
Tories
would leave jobless workers behind
August 12, 2009
By Mike Savage
Liberal
MP for DartmouthCole Harbour
and Marlene Jennings
Liberal MP for Notre-Dame-de-GrâceLachine
On
June 17, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and Prime Minister Stephen Harper agreed
to form a working group that would look at reforms to employment insurance to
improve fairness in eligibility requirements for Canadians laid off during this
recession. (...) With 58 different [Employment Insurance eligibility] standards
across the country, there are communities where one person is eligible for benefits
while her neighbour across the street with the same number of hours worked will
not qualify. This makes no sense, as the Prime Minister admitted back in June.
This is why many of Canada's premiers have supported the call for a single national
standard for EI eligibility. They are joined by the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives, the Canadian Labour Congress, TD Bank economists and the C.D. Howe
Institute, among others.
Marlene Jennings and Mike
Savage are Liberal members of the Employment Insurance Working Group.
Source:
The
Toronto Star
Premiers
Agree on EI Reforms and Call for a Retirement Income Summit
(PDF - 27K, 2 pages)
August 6, 2009
REGINA Premiers agreed on the
urgent need to modernize the Employment Insurance system to support a modern workforce
in a modern economy and called for a national summit on retirement income
Source:
Council
of the Federation
On December 5, 2003, Canadas Premiers proudly announced
in Charlottetown the creation of the Council of the Federation. It is a new institution
for a new era in collaborative intergovernmental relations. The Council of the
Federation was created by Premiers because they believe it is important for provinces
and territories to play a leadership role in revitalizing the Canadian federation
and building a more constructive and cooperative federal system.
Related links:
This
time, Ottawa isn't the target
August 7, 2009
By Jim Coyle
(...)
As they formally opened the Council of the Federation yesterday, Canada's premiers
had an uncharacteristically meaty agenda and unusually kind words for their own
federal government. Instead, the hottest blasts were aimed at the United States
and the protectionist Buy America initiatives there that threaten Canadian access
to those markets. (...) The premiers have sketched out principles to modernize
the employment insurance scheme, reviewed stimulus spending of levels unimaginable
when they met a year ago, and endorsed McGuinty's call for a national summit on
pensions.
Source:
Toronto Star
Grits,
Tories squabble over EI costs:
Cost has become the latest flashpoint between
Conservatives and Liberals
in their potentially election-provoking squabble
over employment insurance reform.
Federal officials claimed Thursday
that a Liberal proposal to ease access to jobless benefits would cost more than
$4 billion a year to implement. But Liberals charged the governing Tories have
"grossly inflated" the number of unemployed who'd be eligible for EI
under their plan, thereby producing "astronomical costs" to justify
their flat rejection of the proposal.
Source:
CBC
Lorne
Gunter: The scam we call 'Employment Insurance'
August 7, 2009
By
Lorne Gunter
There is almost nothing about Canada's Employment Insurance (EI)
program that is as it appears. Even its name is a dodge. The plan does not insure
against employment; that would be absurd. It insures against unemployment. Yet,
in keeping with the disingenuous nature of the program, the name was changed to
EI (from Unemployment Insurance) more than a decade ago in the naive hope that
somehow the superficial switch in branding would encourage beneficiaries to find
and keep jobs.
Source:
National Post
There's
jobless, and officially jobless
When
Statscan issues its jobs data today [see related
link below], it won't tally those who have given
up or postponed their searches
By Tavia Grant
August
7, 2009
(...) When Statistics Canada reports its monthly job count today, many
unemployed people (...) who have either postponed or given up their job search
won't be tallied. That's because people who haven't hunted for jobs in the past
month aren't counted as unemployed or as part of the labour force. The gap between
the actual unemployment rate and the official statistics is likely to widen in
the coming months, as more people give up their job search to go back to school,
or wait until jobs are more abundant, economists say. Many more workers will settle
for part-time jobs, even though they want full-time positions. (...) When involuntary
part-time workers are factored into the equation, Canada's unemployment rate would
have been 11.3 per cent in June, according to Statscan's so-called R8 series on
"underutilized" labour, which is not seasonally adjusted. That's well
above the 8.1-per-cent level it showed in the same month last year, though down
from the 12.4 per cent it reached in March.
Source:
Globe
and Mail
[ Related link:
Labour
Force Survey, July 2009 - Statistics Canada, August 7, 2009 ]
EI
benefits at record levels
Ontario, Alberta show biggest hike
July
29, 2009
The number of people receiving regular employment insurance benefits
jumped to the highest level on record in May, with Alberta and Ontario showing
the biggest increases, Statistics Canada said Tuesday.
EI beneficiaries were
up 9.2 per cent to 778,700 during the month, after a 3.7 per cent rise in April,
the federal agency said.
Source:
Financial
Post
Employment
Insurance (EI) Claims Surge
By
Erin Weir
July 28, 2009
The worst news in todays
Employment Insurance (EI) figures is that new benefit claims hit a record
high. Rising numbers of unemployed workers and hence EI beneficiaries are an unsurprising
result of a deteriorating labour market. However, the increase the number of new
EI claims suggests that the pace of deterioration is worsening rather than easing.
Despite signs of a nascent recovery of economic output, todays figures suggest
that Canadas job market will remain grim for some time to come.
Source:
Progressive
Economics Forum Blog
[ other
posts by Erin Weir ]
[ Progressive
Economics Forum
The Progressive Economics Forum aims to promote the development
of a progressive economics community in Canada. The PEF brings together over 125
progressive economists, working in universities, the labour movement, and activist
research organizations. ]
Canadas
EI benefits well below OECD average: study
Press Release
June
30, 2009
OTTAWAEmployment Insurance benefits in Canada are well below
the OECD average, says a new study released today by the Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives (CCPA). The study, by economist Lars Osberg, finds that in terms
of access, benefit duration, and income replacement levels, EI in Canada falls
far below most other OECD countries and below the levels of Canadian unemployment
insurance in past recessions.
Complete report:
Canadas
Declining Social Safety Net:
The Case for EI Reform (PDF - 592K,
28 pages)
June 2009
By Lars Osberg
"(...) Between October 2008 and
May 2009, 363,000 Canadians lost their jobs and the OECD projects unemployment
to rise to 9.8% in 2010. In this global recession, the weakness of Canadas
Employment Insurance (EI) system has become a glaring federal policy omission.
This study looks at income protection for the unemployed, federally and elsewhere,
and makes a strong case for EI reforms." (Excerpt from the Executive Summary)
Source:
Canadian
Centre for Policy Alternatives
The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
is an independent, non-partisan research institute concerned with issues of social
and economic justice. Founded in 1980, the CCPA is one of Canadas leading
progressive voices in public policy debates.
[ more
CCPA reports and studies ]
[ all
CCPA publications ]
Western
Premiers Agree on a Plan for EI Reform
2009
Western Premiers' Conference
Dawson City, Yukon - June 17-19, 2009
Communique
Friday,
June 19
DAWSON CITY At the 2009 Western Premiers Conference, Premiers
will work in partnership with the federal government to make employment insurance
fair for all Canadians.They welcomed the appointment of the federal working group
on Employment Insurance (EI) and committed to making a joint submission to the
committee.
Source:
Canadian Intergovernmental
Conference
Secretariat
FromThe Globe and Mail:
Provincial
welfare program under strain
Number of two-parent families
collecting assistance up 77 per cent compared to April of last year
By
Justine Hunter
June 2, 2009
Just days after B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell
launched a national campaign to broaden Canada's employment insurance scheme,
new statistics show his provincial welfare program is under growing strain. And
families are bearing the brunt of the recession in B.C., the new provincial statistics
on income assistance show.
B.C.
Premier demands single EI standard
By Patrick Brethour
May
30, 2009
The federal government needs to overhaul a clearly discriminatory
employment insurance system to help the swelling ranks of the jobless in Western
Canada, says British Columbia Premier Gordon Campbell. The Premier is adding his
voice to the chorus pressing the federal government to rewrite the rulebook for
employment insurance, and to create a single national standard for how long Canadians
need to work before becoming eligible for payments. Canadians are Canadians,
and they should be treated equally, he told The Globe and Mail. Right now,
there are dramatic discrepancies in the EI system, with those in areas of historically
low unemployment having to work more than twice as long to qualify for payments
as those in regions with the highest levels of joblessness. That means it's much
more likely for laid-off workers in such low-unemployment areas to fall short
of qualifying for EI, even though a similar worker in a more disadvantaged area
would receive payments.
Ottawa
and the provinces must extend a helping hand to workers
We
need to eliminate regional discrepancies and co-operate to extend EI benefits
By
Gordon Campbell (Premier of British Columbia)
May 29. 2009
With
all of the discussion these days about employment insurance reforms, it is timely
to consider affordable improvements that will assist families and unemployed individuals
who are struggling to get through this global recession. First, we need to eliminate
the regional discrepancies in eligibility rules that are particularly unfair to
Western Canadians. (...) Second, we need to find an affordable way of extending
EI benefits to help workers who have either recently exhausted their benefits
or who are about to lose their EI income. This could be achieved through a new
cost-sharing partnership between the federal and provincial governments that would
redirect some provincial income assistance funding to help the federal government
fund extended EI benefits. (...) Provincial governments can be part of the solution
by offering to partner with the federal government in extending individuals' maximum
EI benefits. Instead of making income assistance payments to those people, they
could offer to transfer that funding to the federal government to help fund the
cost of extended EI benefits. (...) The federal government and provinces should
work in partnership to do the best we can for all of Canada's workers, regardless
of where they live or are employed. They pay equivalent national taxes and all
should receive equivalent national benefits. We must unite in providing Canadians
more effective support as we move through these trying times.
Uninsured:
Why EI is Failing Working Ontarians
News
Release
Posted May 25, 2009
(...) In 2008, approximately 1 in 5 unemployed
workers in Toronto were eligible for EI. While unemployed workers were struggling
to make ends meet, the accumulated surplus of EI premiums soared to over $54 billion.
UNINSURED:
Why EI is Failing Working Ontarians (PDF - 2.7MB, 25 pages)
May
2009
Source:
Community
Social Planning Council of Toronto
The Community Social Planning Council
of Toronto is committed to independent social planning at the local and city-wide
levels in order to improve the quality of life for all people in Toronto. It is
committed to diversity, social and economic justice, and active citizen participation
in all aspects of community life.
Is
Canada's Employment Insurance Program Adequate? (PDF - 120K, 16 pages)
April
30, 2009
Special Report
Source:
TD
Economics
Employment
Insurance and Women: What You Should Know (PDF
- 130K, 6 pages)
[* includes links to nearly three dozen online resources]
April
2009
Table of contents:
1.
Fewer Women Qualify
2. Accumulating Those Magic Hours
3. When Caring Conflicts
With Work
4. Womens Benefits Are Low
5. Inadequate Sickness Benefits
6.
A Poor Plan For Parents
7. Quebec Parents Have It
8. Inadequate Caregiving
Leave
9. What Women Want
10. In Support of Effective Policies
Source:
New Brunswick Advisory Council on the
Status of Women
NOTE: the home page contains
links to several dozen more reports
Gender
aspects of Employment Insurance (PDF - 81K, 20 pages)
By Ken Battle
March 2009
Ken Battle appeared before the Commons Standing Committee on the
Status of Women. His presentation discusses gender aspects of the Employment Insurance
program.
Source:
Caledon Institute
of Social Policy
Also from Caledon:
Is
Canadas Employment Insurance Program Adequate? (PDF - 17K, 3
pages)
Press Release
April 30, 2009
TORONTO -- The sizeable discrepancy
of Employment Insurance (EI) eligibility requirements between regions must be
addressed, according to a new report by TD Economics. But its authors warn that
any
reform must be balanced against undesirable effects such as the potential
for increased dependency on EI and longer-term costs. (...) Currently the eligibility
for and duration of EI benefits depends on the unemployment rate in the region
in which the unemployed worker resides. The number of hours required to qualify
for EI known as the Variable Entrance Requirement (VER) -- increases if
the regional unemployment rate is in a lower range. (...) In the immediate term,
the report recommends flattening the eligibility structure whereby
individuals qualify with 560 hours in all regions with less than 10 percent unemployment.
Such a move would represent a cost of $500 million per year to the program.
Full
Report (PDF - 120K, 16 pages)
By Derek Burleton and Grant Bishop
-
includes the executive summary
Executive Summary (PDF - 19K, 2 pages)
Source:
TD
Economics
EI
Financing: We Told You So
Posted by Erin
Weir
April 23, 2009
On the first of this month, I appeared before the Senates
Standing Committee on National Finance regarding the Employment Insurance (EI)
provisions of the 2009 Budget Implementation Act. The Senate recently posted the
transcript online. A fellow panellist was Michel Bédard,
former Chief Actuary of the EI Fund. Last
year, he and I appeared in the same panel before the same committee regarding
the 2008 Budget Implementation Act. We both argued then that, if unemployment
increased, the governments quasi-reserve of $2 billion would quickly prove
insufficient to maintain (let alone improve) EI benefits without hiking premiums.
Budget 2009 implicitly acknowledges that this concern was valid. Specifically,
it suggests that a further $4.5 billion will be needed to freeze premiums for
two years given higher unemployment.
See also:
Worsening
Unemployment Calls for Better Employment Insurance
April 9 2009
Source:
Relentlessly
Progressive Economics
[A Blog of the Progressive
Economics Forum]
Related links:
Proceedings
of the
Standing Senate Committee on National Finance
Issue 5 -
Evidence - Meeting of April 1, 2009
Panel members:
Michel Bédard,
Member, Task Force on the Financing of Employment Insurance, Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
Erin Weir, Economist, United Steelworkers
Phil Benson,
a lobbyist with Teamsters Canada
Source:
Senate
Standing Committee on National Finance - 40th Parliament, 2nd Session
(January 26, 2009 - )
Frayed
safety net for unemployed
Unequal access to jobless benefits worsens impact
of `Great Recession'
By Michael Mendelson, Ken Battle and Sherri Torjman
[
Caledon Institute of Social Policy ]
April
21, 2009
An additional 41,000 Canadians were out of work this March, bringing
unemployment close to one and a half million. This frightening number will almost
certainly keep climbing in the next several months. Bailouts and building projects
will help, but the essential program for most jobless Canadians remains the Employment
Insurance system. The program was introduced in the wake of the Great Depression
and got us through many difficult times since, most recently the recessions of
1982 and 1990. Is the program up to the challenge of the Great Recession of 2009?
In the 1982 recession, jobless benefits helped 76 per cent of the unemployed.
During the 1990 recession, fully 83 per cent received benefits. Today coverage
is down to 43 per cent half of what it was in 1990.
Canada's
Shrinking Safety Net:
Employment Insurance in the Great Recession
(PDF - 41K, 5 pages)
Michael Mendelson, Ken Battle and Sherri Torjman
April
2009
Belt-tightening changes made to Employment Insurance
in the 1990s have decimated the programs coverage over the years and substantially
reduced the value of payments. Today only three in ten unemployed Canadians receive
regular EI benefits in contrast to eight in ten in the last recession, in 1990.
There is a gender gap in coverage, and it has widened. Both eligibility for benefits
and the maximum duration of benefits vary widely from community to community and
province to province, leading to unfair treatment of the unemployed. Caledon
proposes several immediate changes to strengthen EI, including: a uniform set
of rules governing entrance requirements and length of benefits, increasing the
earnings-replacement rate from the current 55 to 70 percent of insurable earnings,
and setting premium rates higher in good economic times and lower in bad times.
Source:
Caledon
Institute of Social Policy
Jobless?
Why You Might Not Get Employment Insurance
These days, far fewer
unemployed are eligible.
'Reforms' fattened surpluses, failed to prepare for
bad times say critics.
By Tom Sandborn
February
19, 2009
If you are one of the 129,000 Canadian workers who lost a job last
month, maybe you take comfort that all those employment insurance payments were
deducted from your previous paycheques. Now you can count on insurance payments
to get you through tough times, right? Maybe not. The EI safety net features a
lot more gaps than it did a decade and a half ago. By some measures, only 42 per
cent of Canada's unemployed workers are receiving EI payments, roughly half the
percentage covered during the late 1980s. Just when far more Canadians are poised
to need it, the nation's unemployment insurance scheme is broken, say a growing
chorus of critics.
Source:
The Tyee
From the Toronto Star:
Jobless
rate shows EI reform needed
Editorial
February 7, 2009
With
the loss of 129,000 jobs across Canada in January a record for a single
month the spotlight has returned to the federal stimulus package and whether
it goes far enough to address the current crisis. The $35 billion package, released
as part of the federal budget on Jan. 27, contains some funding to help the jobless
by enhancing skills training and extending Employment Insurance benefits for an
extra five weeks. Unfortunately, however, a majority of unemployed Canadians are
not eligible for Employment Insurance, often because they work on contract or
part-time or in seasonal jobs that don't last long enough for them to qualify.
Flaherty
faces five choices on EI
January 12, 2009
By
Carol Goar
Canada's employment insurance system is outdated, inequitable, stingy
and at serious risk of insolvency in a protracted economic downturn. The dilemma
facing Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, should he decide to fix it, is figuring
out which problem to tackle first. He is not short of advice. Business lobbyists,
union officials, municipal leaders, economists and social activists have all put
forward their prescriptions in the run-up to this month's budget. But Flaherty
can't say yes to everybody. Even if he were to make significant investment in
jobless benefits say $3 billion he'd have to set priorities. The
damage done by 30 years of cutting and dismantling can't be undone in one budget.
The finance minister has five basic options...
Employment
Insurance in desperate need of repair
January
9, 2009
By Carol Goar
For the first time since the Great Depression, Canada
is heading into a serious recession with one of its economic stabilizers badly
broken. Stabilizers are government programs that work automatically to moderate
swings in the economic cycle. The three main ones are employment insurance, which
provides a cushion for people who lose their jobs; welfare, which keeps people
from hitting rock bottom; and income taxes, which decrease when people's earnings
shrink. The one that is broken is employment insurance (although welfare is in
sorry shape). If forecasters are right, 200,000 Canadians will lose their jobs
this year. If current trends continue, just 108,000 will qualify for employment
insurance benefits and 82,000 will actually receive them.
[ earlier articles by Carol Goar ]
Women shut out of Employment Insurance:
Study
November 22, 2007
By Monica Townson & Kevin Hayes
TORONTO Most women are getting shut out of Employment Insurance (EI)
coverage in Canada, says a study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
(CCPA). The gap between men's and womens EI coverage is significant:
40 percent of unemployed men received EI benefits in 2004 while only 32
percent of unemployed women did. Essentially, two in every three working
women who pay into EI dont receive a single penny in benefits if they
lose their jobs, says CCPA Research Associate Monica Townson, who
co-authored Women and The Employment Insurance Program with Kevin Hayes.
Complete study:
Women
and the Employment Insurance Program (PDF file - 796K, 40 pages)
Version française:
Les
femmes et le programme d'assurance-emploi (fichier PDF - 781
Ko, 40 pages)
Source:
Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives
The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is an independent, non-partisan
research institute concerned with issues of social and economic justice.
Founded in 1980, the CCPA is one of Canadas leading progressive voices
in public policy debates.
[ more CCPA reports and studies ]
Related link:
Employment
Insurance short-changes women, study suggests
November 21, 2007
Canadian
women are being unfairly short-changed by the country's Employment Insurance system,
which was made more restrictive a decade ago and now boasts a multibillion-dollar
surplus, a study concludes. The study for the left-leaning Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives, to be released today, finds the qualification requirements
for EI have left many women who lose their jobs out of pocket despite having paid
their fair share of premiums.
Source:
Toronto
Star
|
International
From the Los Angeles Times:
Unemployment
benefits expire as Congress debates extension
Lawmakers are likely to take up the issue when they return from spring break
next week. The sticking point is how to pay for an extension.
By Clement Tan
April 6, 2010
As unemployment benefits expired Monday for tens of thousands of jobless
workers, Democrats and Republicans renewed their haggling over whether to
vote for an extension when Congress returns from its spring break next week.
At the heart of the dispute is whether the extension should be offset by
spending cuts, as Republicans are demanding, or whether it constitutes an
emergency, as Democrats say. The expiration means 212,000 unemployed people
will lose benefits this week, according to figures provided by the National
Employment Law Project.
Editorial
A
federal balancing act
Congress won't resolve the federal deficit problem by arguing over emergency
spending programs aimed at spurring the economy. The real problems are far
larger.
April 18, 2010
Call it Congress' version of "lather, rinse, repeat." Last week,
lawmakers approved a short-term extension of unemployment benefits after
overcoming yet another GOP filibuster, the third such extension since December.
The extension lasts only until early June, so Congress may soon be going
through the same routine again. Republicans object to borrowing money to
finance the extra benefits, while Democrats refuse to offset the additional
spending by cutting other parts of the budget.
Source:
Los Angeles Times
---------------------------------
Related links:
Unemployment Insurance - from the U.S. Department of Labor
Unemployment benefits - from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Links
to Information about
Unemployment Insurance
programs in each state in the U.S.
- from America's Service Locator
---
National Employment Law
Project
The National Employment Law Project (NELP) responds (to worker insecurity
and inequality) by working to restore the promise of economic opportunity
in the 21st century economy. (...) We partner with strong advocacy networks,
grounded in the full range of stakeholders - grassroots groups and national
organizations, worker centers and unions, policymakers and think tanks.
NELP
Issues: Unemployment Insurance
In an increasingly volatile economy, working families need a strong unemployment
insurance program - one that is there in hard times to help them pay the
bills and find new jobs that meet their needs and aspirations. However,
the unemployment insurance safety net has failed to keep pace with the changing
labor force, especially the growth in women, part-time and low-wage workers.
In response, policymakers in over half the states have adopted significant
reforms in recent years to modernize their unemployment insurance (UI) programs.
Unemployed
Workers Home
A special project of the National Employment Law Project
---
Compared to Canada?
International
unemployment rates:
how comparable are they? (PDF - 96K,
18 pages)
September 2001
Adjusted to U.S. concepts, the Canadian unemployment rate is reduced by
1 percentage point; effects of adjustments on European unemployment rates
are smaller.
Source:
Department of Labor
---
Unemployment
compensation in a worldwide recession (PDF - 80K, 13 pages)
By W. Vroman and V. Brusentsev
June 2009
(International data)
Source:
The Urban Institute, Washington
| PAGE D'ACCUEIL - SITES DE RECHERCHE SOCIALE AU CANADA |
| TIP:
How to Search for a Word or Expression on a Single Web Page Open any web page in your browser, then hold down the Control ("Ctrl") key on your keyboard and type the letter F to open a "Find" window. Type or paste in a key word or expression and hit Enter - your browser will go directly to the first occurrence of that word (or those exact words, as the case may be). To continue searching using the same keyword(s) throughout the rest of the page, keep clicking on the FIND NEXT button. Try it. It's a great time-saver! |